Programming Question
Programming Question
Ok, I realise this is probably pretty optimistic, but after a *lot* of searching and asking elsewhere, I haven't been able to find an answer yet...
Can anyone tell me how the steering part of Critical Mass works?
What I mean is, any idea how can you calculate the required rate of acceleration and turning required to reach the closest possible point to the mouse cursor?
If there are formulae, they must be quite complicated, as there are a lot of variables: Start X, Start Y, Start Speed, Start Angle, Target X, Target Y...
It can't just use "trial & error"  many combinations of acceleration and turning  as it wouldn't be possible to achieve the pixelperfect results.
Can anyone tell me how the steering part of Critical Mass works?
What I mean is, any idea how can you calculate the required rate of acceleration and turning required to reach the closest possible point to the mouse cursor?
If there are formulae, they must be quite complicated, as there are a lot of variables: Start X, Start Y, Start Speed, Start Angle, Target X, Target Y...
It can't just use "trial & error"  many combinations of acceleration and turning  as it wouldn't be possible to achieve the pixelperfect results.
Re: Programming Question
I'm willing to bet that Sean is using a fairly standard set of functions to draw the arc and calculate the end point.Sketchy wrote:Ok, I realise this is probably pretty optimistic, but after a *lot* of searching and asking elsewhere, I haven't been able to find an answer yet...
Can anyone tell me how the steering part of Critical Mass works?
What I mean is, any idea how can you calculate the required rate of acceleration and turning required to reach the closest possible point to the mouse cursor?
If there are formulae, they must be quite complicated, as there are a lot of variables: Start X, Start Y, Start Speed, Start Angle, Target X, Target Y...
It can't just use "trial & error"  many combinations of acceleration and turning  as it wouldn't be possible to achieve the pixelperfect results.
"Every man is my superior in that I may learn from him."
Don't take life too seriously, you won't make it out alive!
Don't take life too seriously, you won't make it out alive!

 Posts: 139
 Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:37 pm
 Location: NY
 Contact:
from what i can see, the acceleration is based on distance from the center of the ship , i.e. distance formula with the square root of the sum of the squares. the ship will have some set velocity, including the "speed" or the distance the ship will travel (which i suspect is measured in pixels), and direction. so the next turn's speed will be set to the new distance or as close as possible with a max difference equal to the thrust.
the direction is gotten from by calculating the angle from the direction the ship is facing. then i think this angle is multiplied by two to get how much the ship actually turns. of course i have no clue how critical mass calculates it, but the basic principles for different methods should be (nearly) the same. basically, it's polar coordinate stuff with x=r * cos(θ) and y=r * sin(θ), or θ = arccos(x/r) = arsin(y/r), where x is the difference in xcoordinates and y the difference in ycoordinates of the ship and mouse (mouse minus ship), r the distance from ship to mouse, and θ the angle between the ray moving to the right of the ship and the line from the ship to the mouse. this can be compared to the direction the ship is facing, or its current angle, to find the difference and then how much to turn by. the turn value shows the max number of degrees the ship can change direction its direction by each turn.
so with these, i imagine the total range a ship can fly into is like one of those slices of a slice of a pineapple. i hope that was understandable and that i'm as sane as i think i am. i'm not quite sure how to make the arc the ship travels though and too lazy to figure it out :p
i have another question though. the radar range of a ship. is it a rectangle or a nice ellipse or something done in polar coordinates using the distance to each side?
EDIT: it doesn't really matter, but now that i think about it, the "positive xaxis," or the ray pointing to the right, that i talked about could actually be pointing up because that's what it is in the mission editor and it may simplify some game mechanics, though it's easier to think in terms of the standard coordinate system they teach us with.
oh, oh! question two! so when you move, does the "radar range" move with the ship "realtime" or not, so can you sweep an area with strong radar on one side of the ship?
ah, yes, i just realized the arc can be made using the endpoints and the tangents.
the direction is gotten from by calculating the angle from the direction the ship is facing. then i think this angle is multiplied by two to get how much the ship actually turns. of course i have no clue how critical mass calculates it, but the basic principles for different methods should be (nearly) the same. basically, it's polar coordinate stuff with x=r * cos(θ) and y=r * sin(θ), or θ = arccos(x/r) = arsin(y/r), where x is the difference in xcoordinates and y the difference in ycoordinates of the ship and mouse (mouse minus ship), r the distance from ship to mouse, and θ the angle between the ray moving to the right of the ship and the line from the ship to the mouse. this can be compared to the direction the ship is facing, or its current angle, to find the difference and then how much to turn by. the turn value shows the max number of degrees the ship can change direction its direction by each turn.
so with these, i imagine the total range a ship can fly into is like one of those slices of a slice of a pineapple. i hope that was understandable and that i'm as sane as i think i am. i'm not quite sure how to make the arc the ship travels though and too lazy to figure it out :p
i have another question though. the radar range of a ship. is it a rectangle or a nice ellipse or something done in polar coordinates using the distance to each side?
EDIT: it doesn't really matter, but now that i think about it, the "positive xaxis," or the ray pointing to the right, that i talked about could actually be pointing up because that's what it is in the mission editor and it may simplify some game mechanics, though it's easier to think in terms of the standard coordinate system they teach us with.
oh, oh! question two! so when you move, does the "radar range" move with the ship "realtime" or not, so can you sweep an area with strong radar on one side of the ship?
ah, yes, i just realized the arc can be made using the endpoints and the tangents.
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
(O.o)
(> <)
Thanks for the help  I'm going to take some time to digest it, and see what I can come up with.
As for the radar...
I'm pretty sure the range calculation uses the straightline "euclidean" distance, but the radar components on each side cover just a 45 degree arc.
Should result in something like this:
And yes, the radar coverage is continuously updated in realtime.
However, the first time you spot an enemy ship, if you then lose contact with it again by the end of the turn, the siren won't sound  so early in a mission be sure to check your radar at the end of every turn.
As for the radar...
I'm pretty sure the range calculation uses the straightline "euclidean" distance, but the radar components on each side cover just a 45 degree arc.
Should result in something like this:
And yes, the radar coverage is continuously updated in realtime.
However, the first time you spot an enemy ship, if you then lose contact with it again by the end of the turn, the siren won't sound  so early in a mission be sure to check your radar at the end of every turn.
 Fusion_power
 Posts: 327
 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:34 pm
 Contact:
Thanks for the suggestion guys
I understand how to move the ships, once I know the thrust and turning.
The problem is trying to figure out how much thrust and turning are actually needed.
Critical Mass seems to be the only game that calculates thrust & turning from a destination  other similar games, such as FlightCommander2, OverTheReich, and AchtungSpitfire, all require you to enter them directly (using an onscreen joystick & throttle) and then show you the resulting flight path.
It's no use finding the distance between the ship and the mouse  the actual distance travelled will vary depending on the rate of turning, as a straight line is going to be shorter than a curve. The same applies to the ships angle  they can't be treated as if they are independent of one another.
Also, it isn't enough to just pass through the destination  it must be reached after a precise amount of time (ie. the end of the turn).
Again, I can see how Bezier curves are useful for plotting specific points along the ships flightpath, but I don't see how you could extract thrust & turning from one.
If P0 = start, and P2 = target, how do you know P1?
Presumably, it would need to be a very highorder curve too, as a quadratic curve couldn't account for acceleration?
I understand how to move the ships, once I know the thrust and turning.
The problem is trying to figure out how much thrust and turning are actually needed.
Critical Mass seems to be the only game that calculates thrust & turning from a destination  other similar games, such as FlightCommander2, OverTheReich, and AchtungSpitfire, all require you to enter them directly (using an onscreen joystick & throttle) and then show you the resulting flight path.
It's no use finding the distance between the ship and the mouse  the actual distance travelled will vary depending on the rate of turning, as a straight line is going to be shorter than a curve. The same applies to the ships angle  they can't be treated as if they are independent of one another.
Also, it isn't enough to just pass through the destination  it must be reached after a precise amount of time (ie. the end of the turn).
Again, I can see how Bezier curves are useful for plotting specific points along the ships flightpath, but I don't see how you could extract thrust & turning from one.
If P0 = start, and P2 = target, how do you know P1?
Presumably, it would need to be a very highorder curve too, as a quadratic curve couldn't account for acceleration?
 Fusion_power
 Posts: 327
 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:34 pm
 Contact:
I've read that page (and others on B?zier Curves) many times, and given the 3 or more points, I understand how to draw a curve.
The problem is that I only know 2 points  P0 and P2. How do I find P1?
Is P1 just the point you'd end up at without any rotation or acceleration? If so, I already got as far as drawing that curve.
Even having got a curve though, I don't understand how you can find acceleration & turning from it.
I thought maybe (if I have 50 frames per turn):
* P0 = start point
* P2 = end point (mouse)
* P1 = end point if turning & accel. = 0
* Q0 = 1/50th of the way from P0 to P1
* Q1 = 1/50th of the way from P1 to P2
* B = 1/50th of the way from Q0 to Q1
* Accel. = distance from P0 to B, minus original speed
* Turning = angle from P0 to B, minus original angle
Where have I gone wrong (or is just all completely wrong)?
The problem is that I only know 2 points  P0 and P2. How do I find P1?
Is P1 just the point you'd end up at without any rotation or acceleration? If so, I already got as far as drawing that curve.
Even having got a curve though, I don't understand how you can find acceleration & turning from it.
I thought maybe (if I have 50 frames per turn):
* P0 = start point
* P2 = end point (mouse)
* P1 = end point if turning & accel. = 0
* Q0 = 1/50th of the way from P0 to P1
* Q1 = 1/50th of the way from P1 to P2
* B = 1/50th of the way from Q0 to Q1
* Accel. = distance from P0 to B, minus original speed
* Turning = angle from P0 to B, minus original angle
Where have I gone wrong (or is just all completely wrong)?

 Posts: 442
 Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:09 pm
 Location: Montr?al

 Posts: 139
 Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:37 pm
 Location: NY
 Contact:
wow, so i was completely off (i just checked using a ruler on my screen too lol). however, i still believe that the turn is double the angle between the "no turn" line and the line between mouse and ship. just in case, i will mention that i'm pretty sure acceleration works instantaneously at the start of each turn and you will move each turn with a constant speed.
well, since you already know how to draw the curve figuring out the rest shouldn't be too hard. i can see that in the quadratic example there, P1 is most definitely not end point if turn/accel=0. it is basically the intersection between the line you would travel if turn=0 and the line you would be traveling in after the turn (extending backwards).
now, i am assuming you will want to approximate a circular arc as this is what it's like in CM as far as I can see. after some geometry/trig, the point P1 is a distance d=(r/2)/cos(θ) along the line of travel if turn=0, where θ = angle between line of travel if turn=0 and line between ship and mouse and r is distance from ship to mouse.
i'll add more stuff if i can figure it out
well, since you already know how to draw the curve figuring out the rest shouldn't be too hard. i can see that in the quadratic example there, P1 is most definitely not end point if turn/accel=0. it is basically the intersection between the line you would travel if turn=0 and the line you would be traveling in after the turn (extending backwards).
now, i am assuming you will want to approximate a circular arc as this is what it's like in CM as far as I can see. after some geometry/trig, the point P1 is a distance d=(r/2)/cos(θ) along the line of travel if turn=0, where θ = angle between line of travel if turn=0 and line between ship and mouse and r is distance from ship to mouse.
i'll add more stuff if i can figure it out
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
(O.o)
(> <)
Sorare31:
Missiles have a much higher top speed than ships, and rather than trying to follow the path the ship takes, they can "cut corners" (although they can't "lead their target"). I'm pretty sure a modern AAM couldn't outturn something like an F16, but it can fly at Mach4+ so it doesn't need to.
Oriks fired from close range are easy to avoid because they haven't had time to get up to speed yet. Once they've been in the air for a couple of turns though, they become really very annoying.
Umeboshi110:
Thankyou so much  this is just the kind of detailed help I was hoping for
You're absolutely right about acceleration being instant, and speed constant. I was convinced that wasn't the case before, but I did some tests, and there's no doubt about it. It seems like that ought to make things easier?
I'm going to put that formula of yours into my program and see how it looks.
I have another question though:
Any thoughts on the best way to make a ship reverse, rather than trying to just turn really tightly?
Missiles have a much higher top speed than ships, and rather than trying to follow the path the ship takes, they can "cut corners" (although they can't "lead their target"). I'm pretty sure a modern AAM couldn't outturn something like an F16, but it can fly at Mach4+ so it doesn't need to.
Oriks fired from close range are easy to avoid because they haven't had time to get up to speed yet. Once they've been in the air for a couple of turns though, they become really very annoying.
Umeboshi110:
Thankyou so much  this is just the kind of detailed help I was hoping for
You're absolutely right about acceleration being instant, and speed constant. I was convinced that wasn't the case before, but I did some tests, and there's no doubt about it. It seems like that ought to make things easier?
I'm going to put that formula of yours into my program and see how it looks.
I have another question though:
Any thoughts on the best way to make a ship reverse, rather than trying to just turn really tightly?