Defeat your enemies and conquer the world
-
TheKangaroo
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:07 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Post
by TheKangaroo » Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:18 pm
Yea, I just mean: does it make a difference whether that is by dropping a 30Mt hydrogene bomb or by a couple of thousand 2000lb bombs?
-
Andy
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:42 pm
- Location: Edinburgh! (its le balls)
Post
by Andy » Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:33 pm
if it was an old school ww1 bomber with about 5 kilos of damp cheese on it, or a flight of bombers all with massive hydrogen bombs
________
og kush pictures
Last edited by
Andy on Sat Feb 05, 2011 1:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Akfrost
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 5:38 am
Post
by Akfrost » Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:53 pm
well, actually i think it would be somewhere around a neutron bomb since you can bomb a city repeately without actually destroying the thing, but all life will be extinguished.
-
jftsang
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:38 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the UK
Post
by jftsang » Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:32 pm
i like to stock up with five or six bomber units and then use them on enemy bases (five or six to cover more land and less chance of fighters shooting them down.
-
jftsang
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:38 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the UK
Post
by jftsang » Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:35 pm
Akfrost wrote:well, actually i think it would be somewhere around a neutron bomb since you can bomb a city repeately without actually destroying the thing, but all life will be extinguished.
I think that it should be made so that each city has a population in it, and the more population the quicker pieces are made and bombers destroy SOME units (not all, otherwise they are too strong) and population and if population drops too low then it is neutral (unless there are still troops there).
